<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dissect, disassemble, open the Nokia Booklet</title>
	<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/</link>
	<description>//code, //design, //real life</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: René</title>
		<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-71853</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-71853</guid>
					<description>I guess you mean MByte instead of MBit?

Well, I get approx. 40MByte/s write (into an HFS+ file under OSX) and 58MB/s read performance (from the same test file in an FS, under OSX, too). Without an file system in between the numbers might be slightly higher.

The limiting factor certainly is the Intel Poulsbo SCH, which only implements PATA and the Nokia Booklet is using an PATA to SATA bridge to connect the disk, ...

This transfer rate, and especially latency is if course magnitudes better then the very slow 1.8" Toshiba drive Nokia ships. So it is still a vast performance improvement for the otherwise laggy Z-series Atom system, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you mean MByte instead of MBit?</p>
<p>Well, I get approx. 40MByte/s write (into an HFS+ file under OSX) and 58MB/s read performance (from the same test file in an FS, under OSX, too). Without an file system in between the numbers might be slightly higher.</p>
<p>The limiting factor certainly is the Intel Poulsbo SCH, which only implements PATA and the Nokia Booklet is using an PATA to SATA bridge to connect the disk, &#8230;</p>
<p>This transfer rate, and especially latency is if course magnitudes better then the very slow 1.8&#8243; Toshiba drive Nokia ships. So it is still a vast performance improvement for the otherwise laggy Z-series Atom system, &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: juergen</title>
		<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-71850</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-71850</guid>
					<description>I did the same: but bad performance

max 55 MBIT/s read with an ssd which is able to handle 200 MBIT/s

any solutions? maybe the original driver is bad oder the controller is too weak

thanks for any solutions posted right here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the same: but bad performance</p>
<p>max 55 MBIT/s read with an ssd which is able to handle 200 MBIT/s</p>
<p>any solutions? maybe the original driver is bad oder the controller is too weak</p>
<p>thanks for any solutions posted right here
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: René</title>
		<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-68053</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-68053</guid>
					<description>That support site does not list anything new in regards to the Windows 7 SSD trim issue due to the PATA to SATA bridge. As I wrote, I already got Windows 7 on the Booklet the other day.

The problem with the older Intel G1 SSD is, that due to the older manufactoring process (50nm vs 45nm IIRC) they are still even more expensive, and the last G1 firmware versions also offer TRIM support, ... Even without TRIM being used, the G2, Postville performance should still be a little better, and I guess (hope) they further polished, and fine-tuned the firmware, especially for long term performance and durability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That support site does not list anything new in regards to the Windows 7 SSD trim issue due to the PATA to SATA bridge. As I wrote, I already got Windows 7 on the Booklet the other day.</p>
<p>The problem with the older Intel G1 SSD is, that due to the older manufactoring process (50nm vs 45nm IIRC) they are still even more expensive, and the last G1 firmware versions also offer TRIM support, &#8230; Even without TRIM being used, the G2, Postville performance should still be a little better, and I guess (hope) they further polished, and fine-tuned the firmware, especially for long term performance and durability.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Myroslav Opyr</title>
		<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-68045</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rene.rebe.de/2010-04-08/dissect-disassemble-open-the-nokia-booklet/#comment-68045</guid>
					<description>Thank you for your dissection photos as there is not too many of them online.

For instructions regarding Windows 7 on SSD supporting TRIM operation see http://discussions.europe.nokia.com/t5/Mini-Laptops/SDD-compatibility-the-real-reason-why-some-do-work-and-some-do/m-p/665782#U665782

Or you could go with Intel X18-M G1, you shouldn't loose anything and have saved some time ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your dissection photos as there is not too many of them online.</p>
<p>For instructions regarding Windows 7 on SSD supporting TRIM operation see <a href="http://discussions.europe.nokia.com/t5/Mini-Laptops/SDD-compatibility-the-real-reason-why-some-do-work-and-some-do/m-p/665782#U665782" rel="nofollow">http://discussions.europe.nokia.com/t5/Mini-Laptops/SDD-compatibility-the-real-reason-why-some-do-work-and-some-do/m-p/665782#U665782</a></p>
<p>Or you could go with Intel X18-M G1, you shouldn&#8217;t loose anything and have saved some time <img src='http://rene.rebe.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

