<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux file-systems compared 2008/Q1</title>
	<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2008-02-03/linux-file-systems-compare-2008q1/</link>
	<description>//code, //design, //real life</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Faysal Banna</title>
		<link>http://rene.rebe.de/2008-02-03/linux-file-systems-compare-2008q1/#comment-35005</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rene.rebe.de/2008-02-03/linux-file-systems-compare-2008q1/#comment-35005</guid>
					<description>Rene.
I would like your opinion in implementing Very High performance Cache engine .... which filesystem would perfectly fit for thousands of various files ?? Reiserfs XFS or JFS with directory structure extending for thousands of sub directories .....


I am using Fedora 8 with latest patches and updates available ....

Much regards
Faysal Banna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rene.<br />
I would like your opinion in implementing Very High performance Cache engine &#8230;. which filesystem would perfectly fit for thousands of various files ?? Reiserfs XFS or JFS with directory structure extending for thousands of sub directories &#8230;..</p>
<p>I am using Fedora 8 with latest patches and updates available &#8230;.</p>
<p>Much regards<br />
Faysal Banna
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

